IF-09 · Cockpit interface

AI cockpit tool invocation and confirmation

Ground model proposals in versioned tools, policy, vehicle state, confirmation and auditable terminal evidence.

Name the source—and name what it cannot prove.

The same message can be observation, projection, plan, receipt or physical evidence. This contract keeps those meanings separate.

Authority

Authoritative map, route, vehicle and service tools own facts and actions; the model may propose but never become source authority.

Degraded behavior

Unavailable model or tool uses an explicit local fallback; prohibited or stale actions fail before invocation.

Outcome boundary

Model text, a confirmation receipt or a tool call does not imply vehicle, partner, payment or human outcome.

Producer and consumer responsibilities are explicit.

A product can appear on both sides when it transforms one authority into another; each transformation retains its own evidence.

Choose transport after semantics are fixed.

The program can select one or more transports without changing the source authority or failure contract.

Typed tool SDKCockpit intent APIConfirmation receipt event

Compatibility vector

  • schema or ABI version
  • producer release
  • consumer release
  • policy and entitlement revision
  • content/configuration revision
  • territory/platform profile

Acceptance evidence

  • contract compatibility
  • nominal and negative scenarios
  • ordering, replay and idempotency
  • latency, capacity and resource bounds
  • security, privacy and role enforcement
  • offline, recovery and rollback
  • target or operational acceptance
OEM program workshop

Freeze the AI cockpit tool invocation and confirmation contract before integration.

Allocate owners, transport, schema, releases, policy, content, degradation, replay and target acceptance in one controlled baseline.